![]() It is unrealistic to expect a halt to attacks on coalition forces and Iraqis working with the coalition any time soon. Coalition forces should have been better prepared to move quickly into the Sunni Triangle after the fall of Baghdad, though it is unclear whether they would have known who to look for beyond the most senior adherents of the former regime. Although they made the correct choice, coalition planners are now dealing with the inevitable consequences of that decision as they face an armed opposition composed of former regime loyalists. Coalition war planners made a deliberate, fundamental tradeoff, choosing "speed and shock" to promote a rapid collapse of Saddam's regime rather than pursuing a more thorough defeat of specific regime elements from the start. Yet, those individuals most crucial to the current resistance (e.g., members of the Republican Guard and Special Security Organization midlevel Ba'athist officials) would most likely have gone to ground and escaped to fight another day. To be sure, coalition forces would likely have killed more of the regime's Fedayeen Saddam cannon fodder if they had invaded from Turkey. ![]() ![]() Some have argued that the coalition might not be facing stiff resistance today if it had fought the war differently.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |